Buy on Amazon
€79.14
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Core i5-10210U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 253 days newer than Core i5-10210U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10210U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-10210U - 562 vs 522 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10210U - 12 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-10400F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
562
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-10400F (Base Clock: 2.90 GHz; Socket: LGA1200; 65 Watt) Box
Buy for €79.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-10210U
Mobile • Aug 21st, 2019
Core i5-10400F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10210U | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 21st, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.