Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9350KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9350KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 478 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9350KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9350KF
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $145.47 vs $180.79
- Up to 18% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-10700K - $1.21 vs $1.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 91 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 2% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-9350KF - 136 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9350KF - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9350KF doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
133
97%
Value, €/FPS
€1.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€161.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €161.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.48/FPS
81%
Price, €
€200.68
80%
FPS Winner
Buy for €200.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9350KF | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |