Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9350KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9350KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11500 is 798 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9350KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9350KF
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i5-11500 - $79.97 vs $105.28
- Up to 22% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-11500 - $0.43 vs $0.55 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-9350KF - 214 vs 206 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i3-9350KF - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9350KF - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9350KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
206
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
214
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
78%
Price, €
€116.86
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for €116.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9350KF | vs | Intel Core i5-11500 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |