Buy on Amazon
€161.47
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $173
Availability
MSRP in USD: $173
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9350KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9350KF is 478 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9350KF
- Performs up to 0% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-10400F - 218 vs 217 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i3-9350KF - $73.09 vs $145.47
- Up to 50% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i3-9350KF - $0.37 vs $0.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i3-9350KF - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9350KF - 12 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-9350KF
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
218
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
50%
Price, €
€161.47
50%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i3-9350KF Desktop Processor 4 Core Up to 4.6GHz Unlocked Without Processor Graphics LGA1151 (999F4L)
Buy for €161.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7625 minutes ago
Core i5-10400F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
217
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.13
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-10400F (Base Clock: 2.90 GHz; Socket: LGA1200; 65 Watt) Box
Buy for €81.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7627 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-9350KF
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Core i5-10400F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9350KF | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 91 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.