Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1872 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $72.39 vs $318.79
- Up to 64% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-14900KF - $1.46 vs $4.07 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 58% better in Starfield than Core i3-9100T - 87 vs 55 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 32 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
55
63.2183908045977%
Value, €/FPS
€1.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80.35
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €80.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4023 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
87
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.07/FPS
35.87223587223587%
Price, €
€353.86
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €353.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4029 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Single-Core
1203
38.706563706563706%
Multi-Core
3178
15.103127079174982%
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |