Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1487 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $72.39 vs $277.78
- Up to 67% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-13900K - $0.63 vs $1.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 27% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-9100T - 163 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 32 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
128
78.52760736196319%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80.35
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €80.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3951 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
163
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.89/FPS
33.333333333333336%
Price, €
€308.34
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for €308.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3956 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Single-Core
1203
40.45057162071284%
Multi-Core
3178
15.773277744689299%
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |