Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 1221 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $72.39 vs $263.92
- Up to 58% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-12900F - $0.48 vs $1.14 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 52% better in War Thunder than Core i3-9100T - 256 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 24 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
168
65.625%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80.35
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €80.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2427 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
256
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.14/FPS
42.10526315789474%
Price, €
€292.95
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €292.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2431 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Single-Core
1203
47.3808586057503%
Multi-Core
3178
22.879769618430526%
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |