Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 927 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $72.39 vs $102.37
- Up to 20% better value when playing Resident Evil 4 than Core i5-11600 - $0.47 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 12% better in Resident Evil 4 than Core i3-9100T - 193 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 12 vs 4 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
172
89.11917098445595%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80.35
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €80.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4907 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
79.66101694915254%
Price, €
€113.63
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4910 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Single-Core
1203
56.69180018850142%
Multi-Core
3178
38.81289692232535%
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |