Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100T is 1096 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Performs up to 31% better in F1 23 than Celeron G3900 - 205 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i3-9100T - $29.18 vs $72.39
- Up to 46% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i3-9100T - $0.21 vs $0.39 per FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
53.84615384615385%
Price, €
€80.35
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €80.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3731 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
157
76.58536585365854%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3729 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
48.29592684954281%
Multi-Core
992
31.214600377595975%
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |