Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 32 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $72.39 vs $506.05
- Up to 85% better value when playing Valorant than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.11 vs $0.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Valorant than Core i3-9100T - 761 vs 754 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 24 vs 4 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
754
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80.35
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €80.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
761
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
14%
Price, €
€561.72
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €561.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |