Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 1487 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $72.39 vs $340.09
- Up to 72% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 9 7950X - $0.78 vs $2.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 35 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 32% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-9100T - 136 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 32 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
103
75.73529411764706%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80.35
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €80.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4019 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.78/FPS
28.057553956834536%
Price, €
€377.5
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €377.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4023 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Single-Core
1203
40.94622191967325%
Multi-Core
3178
16.472295651272482%
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |