Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 601 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Up to 50% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - $72.39 vs $146.16
- Up to 50% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen 3 3100 - $0.6 vs $1.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-9100T - 136 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 8 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
133
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80.35
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €80.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
Buy for €162.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |