Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100T outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100T is 2139 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Performs up to 37% better in F1 23 than FX-8350 - 205 vs 150 FPS
- Up to 46% cheaper than FX-8350 - $72.39 vs $133.09
- Up to 60% better value when playing F1 23 than FX-8350 - $0.39 vs $0.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 8 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80.35
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €80.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4922 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
150
73.17073170731707%
Value, €/FPS
€0.98/FPS
39.795918367346935%
Price, €
€147.73
54%
Buy for €147.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4917 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |