Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1721 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $87.75 vs $386.79
- Up to 75% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-14900F - $0.4 vs $1.63 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-9100F - 264 vs 242 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 32 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
242
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
264
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.63/FPS
24%
Price, €
€429.34
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €429.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |