Buy on Amazon
€105.47
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 1330 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 1% better in Death Stranding than Core i7-6700T - 225 vs 222 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $73.05 vs $95.02
- Up to 21% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i3-9100F - $0.37 vs $0.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
225
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
78%
Price, €
€105.47
76%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i3-9100F Desktop Processor 4 Core Up to 4.2 GHz without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for €105.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
222
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.08
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-6700T 2.8GHz Tray CPU
Buy for €81.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.