Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 1361 days older than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - $87.75 vs $131.61
- Up to 33% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-6700K - $0.74 vs $1.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-9100F - 133 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
131
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
Buy for €146.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |