Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-2600S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 3026 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-2600S.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 5% better in World of Tanks than Core i7-2600S - 532 vs 508 FPS
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i7-2600S - $84.08 vs $171.83
- Up to 53% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i7-2600S - $0.18 vs $0.38 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
532
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€93.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €93.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5099 minutes ago
Buy for €190.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5091 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i7-2600S |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |