Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700 is 1008 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i7-12700 - $84.08 vs $194.12
- Up to 54% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i7-12700 - $0.39 vs $0.85 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-9100F - 254 vs 242 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
242
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€93.33
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €93.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
254
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
45%
Price, €
€215.47
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €215.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i7-12700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |