Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 3393 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-530.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 16% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-530 - 266 vs 230 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-530 - 65 vs 73 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-530
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $32.9 vs $62.15
- Up to 38% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i3-9100F - $0.16 vs $0.26 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
266
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
61.53846153846154%
Price, €
€68.99
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for €68.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
230
86.46616541353383%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€36.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €36.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Single-Core
360
26.200873362445414%
Multi-Core
755
20.577814118288362%
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i3-530 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 73 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |