Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 107 days newer than Ryzen 7 3700U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 16% better in Starfield than Ryzen 7 3700U - 58 vs 50 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
58
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700U |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 15 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
No | Overclockable | No |