Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2430 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 26% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-4130 - 554 vs 440 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $16.76 vs $87.75
- Up to 78% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-9100F - $0.04 vs $0.18 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
Buy for €18.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |