Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 229 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield IV than Athlon 200GE - 413 vs 390 FPS
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $51.17 vs $58.5
- Up to 6% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i3-9100F - $0.15 vs $0.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
413
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
93.75%
Price, €
€64.93
87%
FPS Winner
Buy for €64.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3663 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
390
94.43099273607749%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €56.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3662 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Single-Core
889
64.70160116448326%
Multi-Core
1857
50.61324611610794%
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Athlon |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | No |