Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i3-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 2154 days newer than Core i3-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 17% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-8300 - 140 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 32 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
140
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€423.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €423.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58079 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Single-Core
1301
43.079470198675494%
Multi-Core
3825
20.935960591133004%
Intel Core i3-8300 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
62 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |