Buy on Amazon
€162.32
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $138
Availability
MSRP in USD: $138
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 806 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $146.23 vs $160.13
- Up to 7% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Core i7-10700F - $0.95 vs $1.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 62 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 2% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Core i3-8300 - 174 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Core i3-8300
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
FPS
170
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.95/FPS
100%
Price, €
€162.32
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-8300 3.7GHz 8MB Coffee Lake Boxed Desktop Processor
Buy for €162.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
174
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.02/FPS
93%
Price, €
€177.74
91%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for €177.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Core i3-8300
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8300 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
62 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.