Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Core i3-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 874 days newer than Core i3-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 62 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 6% better in Far Cry 5 than Core i3-8300 - 218 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 24 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
218
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€263.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €263.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
62 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |