Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-8300 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 7 1700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-8300 is 349 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 7 1700.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Performs up to 4% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 7 1700 - 172 vs 165 FPS
- Up to 23% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700 - $109.46 vs $142.59
- Up to 26% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 7 1700 - $0.71 vs $0.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700 - 62 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
FPS
172
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €121.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
Buy for €158.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
62 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |