Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Core i3-8130U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 1254 days older than Core i3-8130U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8130U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 15 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-8130U - 172 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8130U - 24 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Feb 13th, 2018
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8130U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD 620 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |