Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i3-8109U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 181 days newer than Core i3-8109U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8109U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 28 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Core i3-8109U - 116 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8109U - 24 vs 4 threads
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
116
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€608.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €608.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10065 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Apr 5th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8109U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 5th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Iris Pro Plus | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |