Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 651 days older than Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 4% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-8100T - 333 vs 319 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 12 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €37.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1073
90.93220338983052%
Multi-Core
3027
55.237226277372265%
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |