Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6700K outperforms the more expensive Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6700K is 975 days older than the more expensive Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 35 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-8100T - 133 vs 125 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i3-8100T - $131.61 vs $149.16
- Up to 17% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-8100T - $1.1 vs $1.32 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €165.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
133
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€146.09
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €146.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |