Buy on Amazon
€165.57
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $117
Availability
MSRP in USD: $117
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100T is 1946 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Performs up to 5% better in God of War than Celeron G1610 - 170 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i3-8100T - $27.05 vs $149.16
- Up to 80% better value when playing God of War than Core i3-8100T - $0.19 vs $0.97 per FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel CM8068403377415 Core i3-8100T Prcsr Tray
Buy for €165.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 328 minutes ago
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
162
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 323 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-8100T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.