Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 184 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Up to 70% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $149.16 vs $498.74
- Up to 67% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $1.66 vs $5.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 10% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i3-8100T - 110 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 24 vs 4 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
100
90%
Value, €/FPS
€1.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€165.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €165.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
110
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.03/FPS
33%
Price, €
€553.6
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for €553.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |