Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 1404 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 12% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G1820 - 111 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i3-8100 - $28.95 vs $98.71
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-8100 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €109.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
Buy for €32.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
39.437751004016064%
Multi-Core
825
24.229074889867842%
Intel Core i3-8100 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |