Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-8100 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-8100 is 35 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 120 vs 119 FPS
- Up to 1% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.74 vs $0.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 0% cheaper than Core i3-8100 - $80.42 vs $80.43
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
120
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.28
99%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €89.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18121 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
119
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
98%
Price, €
€89.27
100%
Buy for €89.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |