Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-8100 outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-8100 is 1808 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8300 - 157 vs 149 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than FX-8300 - $80.43 vs $81.91
- Up to 7% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8300 - $0.57 vs $0.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
157
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.28
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €89.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Buy for €90.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |