Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7350K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 2561 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $37.73 vs $386.79
- Up to 89% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-14900F - $0.21 vs $1.84 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 15% better in Valheim than Core i3-7350K - 233 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 32 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
202
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€41.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €41.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
Buy for €429.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
60 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |