Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 2561 days newer than Core i3-7350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 22% better in No Man's Sky than Core i3-7350K - 215 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 32 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-7350K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7350K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1452
48.079470198675494%
Multi-Core
2873
15.725232621784347%
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 60 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
