Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7350K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $37.73 vs $164.51
- Up to 76% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-10900F - $0.11 vs $0.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 60 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-7350K - 402 vs 371 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 20 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
371
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€41.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €41.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15245 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
402
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
24%
Price, €
€182.61
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €182.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15245 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |