Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7350K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 2561 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $37.73 vs $153.54
- Up to 74% better value when playing Valorant than Core i5-14400F - $0.05 vs $0.19 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 14% better in Valorant than Core i3-7350K - 894 vs 781 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 16 vs 4 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
781
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€41.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €41.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13881 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
894
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
26%
Price, €
€170.43
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €170.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13881 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
60 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |