Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7350K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $37.73 vs $131.6
- Up to 68% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i5-11600K - $0.48 vs $1.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 60 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 9% better in Remnant II than Core i3-7350K - 96 vs 88 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 12 vs 4 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
88
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€41.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €41.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14523 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
96
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.52/FPS
31%
Price, €
€146.08
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €146.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14524 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |