Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7350K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7350K is 1583 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 19% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-3240T - 129 vs 108 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i3-7350K - $18.79 vs $37.73
- Up to 41% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-7350K - $0.19 vs $0.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i3-7350K - 35 vs 60 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €41.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
108
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
60 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |