Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7350K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i3-10300 - $37.73 vs $145.55
- Up to 74% better value when playing Apex Legends than Core i3-10300 - $0.15 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i3-10300 - 60 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 1% better in Apex Legends than Core i3-7350K - 281 vs 278 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 8 vs 4 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
278
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€41.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €41.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
281
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
26%
Price, €
€161.56
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for €161.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |