Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7350K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1827 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Up to 14% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - $37.73 vs $43.86
- Up to 10% better value when playing F1 23 than Celeron G6900 - $0.19 vs $0.21 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 23 than Core i3-7350K - 234 vs 223 FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
223
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€41.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €41.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12191 minutes ago
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
60 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |