Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7350K outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7350K is 240 days older than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 184 vs 182 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 60 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 16 vs 4 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-7350K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
80.44077134986226%
Multi-Core
5794
100%
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
