Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7350K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 1281 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $37.73 vs $277.12
- Up to 85% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $0.09 vs $0.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 60 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 2% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i3-7350K - 502 vs 490 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 24 vs 4 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
490
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€41.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €41.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
Buy for €307.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |