Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7350K outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7350K is 98 days older than Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 6% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 1600 - 176 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 60 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 12 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €40.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75962 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |