Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-7300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400 is 1213 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-7300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-7300 - 107 vs 104 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i3-7300 - $91.04 vs $94.32
- Up to 7% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-7300 - $0.94 vs $1.01 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €104.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18560 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
107
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.94/FPS
100%
Price, €
€101.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €101.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18561 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |