Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7300 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7300 and the cheaper Core i3-7100T have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Performs up to 4% better in Rust than Core i3-7100T - 189 vs 182 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i3-7300 - $35.17 vs $72.05
- Up to 50% better value when playing Rust than Core i3-7300 - $0.21 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-7300 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €79.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
182
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €39.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |