Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-14100F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-7300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-14100F is 2561 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-7300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than Core i3-7300 - 288 vs 272 FPS
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i3-7300 - $73.84 vs $94.32
- Up to 26% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-7300 - $0.28 vs $0.38 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 8 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €104.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19170 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
288
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |