Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-7300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1213 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-7300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i3-7300 - 235 vs 233 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i3-7300 - $87.75 vs $94.32
- Up to 9% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i3-7300 - $0.41 vs $0.45 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €104.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
235
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |