Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-7300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1827 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-7300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 3% better in Valheim than Core i3-7300 - 204 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i3-7300 - $54.68 vs $94.32
- Up to 43% better value when playing Valheim than Core i3-7300 - $0.3 vs $0.53 per FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €104.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
204
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €60.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |